Another reason why researchers in all disciplines are increasingly receiving their manuscripts back with the R&R verdict is more straightforward: both (or all, in case of multiple reviewers) peer reviewers may recommend revising and resubmitting the manuscript.
Is getting a revise and resubmit good?
Authors receiving a “revise and resubmit” decision are not likely to do a happy dance upon receiving the email. “Revise and resubmit” (or it’s sibling decision of “reject and resubmit”) often means that there is something the editor (or possibly reviewers) liked, but the paper needs a good bit of work.
Is revise and resubmit a rejection?
A ‘Reject and resubmit’ decision is very similar to ‘Revise and resubmit. ‘ It indicates that the editor has seen some merit in your study, but it is not publishable in its current form. Usually, it would require extensive revision, in most cases, adding new experiments or redoing the data analysis.
What happens after revise and resubmit?
Once you’ve finished revising, the next step is writing the letter or memo that you will send with the revised version of your article. The “revise and resubmit letter” documents how you have responded to all of your reviewers’ comments.
What does it mean revise and resubmit?
When submitting your writing for publication in a journal, the best you can often hope for is to receive a “revise and resubmit” request from the editor. This means the reviewers and editor found value in your manuscript, but want to see revisions.
Can a paper be rejected after major revision?
Answer: Unfortunately, sometimes manuscript do get rejected after the second or even third round of revisions. This can happen due to multiple reasons such as: The authors might not have adequately addressed all the questions raised by the reviewers.
How long should a revise and resubmit take?
Times vary. In my field three weeks for minor and six weeks for major revisions seems common. If the journal does not provide any general guidelines on this one would hope that the editor would do so.
What is the difference between major revision and revise and resubmit?
Major revision indicates the manuscript definitely needs some work and will require additional review, but the manuscript is in decent shape, the research is sound, etc. Revise and resubmit is just a step below reject.
What is the difference between major revision and reject and resubmit?
Reject and Resubmit (or revise and resubmit) (hereafter, R&R) = your article has been rejected. Major revision = your article is in a kind of limbo state where it is neither accepted as is nor rejected but rather held unto the revisions come in.
Can a paper be rejected after minor revision?
No, minor revision doesn’t mean accepted with minor revisions. Strictly speaking, for truly minor revisions, it’s possible that the editor accepts your paper and leaves you to make the remaining changes during proofs. Since the editor didn’t do this, it’s still possible your paper will be declined.
Can you resubmit a rejected paper?
Yes. In fact, some journals encourage resubmission after some months. But such resubmission would have addressed concerns from the previous review. In some other cases, Editor can request that a resubmission should have about 50% changes.
How do you respond to R&R?
Step One: Read the Letter. Other possible responses from the editor include: 1) Reject without an invitation to re-submit; 2) Conditional acceptance, where you are asked to make minor changes; and 3) Outright acceptance, where changes are not required, but might be suggested.
What is minor revision?
Response: A minor revision often implies that there are a limited number of changes that are needed to improve the manuscript for publication. Depending on the extent of the minor revision, the editor may decide not to send it out for re-review.
What does major revision mean?
In short, “major revisions” means you’ve got work to do on your manuscript, but you’re still very much in the game. You had a great research idea to start with. You’re not far from getting it accepted and published. Your target journal’s editor has sent your manuscript to two or more peer reviewers.
What is a revised letter?
A revisions letter is the letter you write to the editor of a journal to which you have submitted a paper for possible publication.
How do I list revise and resubmit on my resume?
Generally, when I have a paper that is just submitted, I put it on my CV and indicate “under review” and do NOT name the journal. If it has received a revise and resubmit, I put it on my CV as “invited revision” and do put the name of the journal there too. If its in revision, put the journal name.
What does a major revision mean?
In short, “major revisions” means you’ve got work to do on your manuscript, but you’re still very much in the game. You had a great research idea to start with. You’re not far from getting it accepted and published. Your target journal’s editor has sent your manuscript to two or more peer reviewers.
How do you write a cover letter for resubmission?
In the cover letter for the resubmission, thank the editors and reviewers for their feedback and outline the changes you made (or did not make) to the manuscript to address the feedback. The cover letter for a revised and resubmitted manuscript summarizes the changes to the manuscript.
What is RevPit twitter?
What are the chances of paper acceptance after major revision?
Papers having two reviewers’ recommendations to accept and minor revision have much greater chance of acceptance (more than 98%) than papers receiving two reviewers’ recommendations that include a major revision and a reject or two rejections (which results in an acceptance rate of less than 5%): (Figure 1).
How long does a minor revision take?
For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision.
How long do major revisions take?
Usually reviewers are given 3 months to review a manuscript which has been rendered a “major revision” decision.
Should I decline or resubmit my Paper?
Decline with encouragement to resubmit may be appropriate for papers where the topic is interesting but there is too much work required to keep the paper in the review loop. The dates that are typically published alongside papers — Received, Revised, Accepted, Published — are important.
Why do editors hate resubmissions so much?
The main reason was the feeling among editors that the resubmissions were rarely really re-written in whole, and the result could be a very drawn out process of over a year that wore down the authors, reviewers, and the editor.
How does a reviewer decline an invitation to review a paper?
That same reviewer gets the exact same paper from Journal B. Feeling ticked that all of the feedback was ignored, the reviewer either declines the invitation to review and tells the editor why, or accepts the invitation and tells the author that he/she is still recommending the paper be declined.
What are the odds of a journal accepting a major revision?
For journals I have managed, the number of “major revision” papers that are eventually accepted stays solidly between 80-90%. When editors, reviewers, and authors have put time into critiquing and improving a paper, it just seems downright unfair to reject the paper. But, there can be a resignation to accept an okay paper at this point too.
